How funny your brand should be?

Back then I was collaborating with a renowned agency on a re-branding project. Upon completion of nation-wide research, we started working on brand personality, one of the building blocks of brand strategy. 

At that point, the creative director of the agency adamantly insisted that the brand should opt for a humorous tone of voice – an idea that did not resonate with me. After all, neither the research nor the competitive audit was pointing towards such a direction. 

So, why were the creatives so hell-bent on using humour? Was that the right tone of voice for the brand? If we were going to use humour, then exactly how funny should the brand be?

With all those questions on my mind, I decided to review the agency’s portfolio. Not surprisingly, I found that -from clothing to food, telecommunications, and fitness centres- they used the same type of humour on most of their work. 

Was the sole and exclusive use of humour an example of Maslow’s Hammer? (Treating everything as if it were a nail when you have a hammer in your hand.) Or did the creative team get possessed by an old habit that prevented them from opening a new door? Or was the use of humour just a cop-out for the agency, who didn’t want to dig deeper to discover another way of communicating?

Was the sole and exclusive use of humour an example of Maslow’s Hammer?

Whatever the case may be, I knew the creatives were not right, but back then, I didn’t have the facts to defend my point of view. In the absence of factual info, often people with the loudest voice win. That’s precisely what happened. 

Fast forward to today. The brand has taken a nosedive, losing a whopping 95% of its stock value. 

Granted, the erroneous tone of voice was just one of the many reasons that contributed to the demise of the brand. Nevertheless, it was clear that using humour -where it was not needed- was a contributing factor. As a consequence, I decided to embark on a fact-finding journey about when and how to use humour in brand communications. 

As you can see, the title of this article has a double meaning. First, it refers to the extent or degree of the use of humour. In short, should you dial up or down your funniness? 

But there is also the way or manner in which you should use humour. So, which type of humour is appropriate to your audience? Let’s go!

 

The use of humour in ads is universal – its impact isn’t.

Creatives around the world invoke humour, which is a common element in advertising. That said, a Millward Brown study shows that North American advertisers resort to humour more often than their colleagues around the world. So, while the use of fun in ads is universal, the frequency with which it is used is higher in North America. The obvious question is, why?

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 9.26.40 AM.png

Westerners believe that funny ads tend to be more impactful. For example, a survey reveals that 94 percent of research and creative directors in U.S. advertising agencies think that fun is effective at gaining attention. In short, humour creates a high level of awareness among the European and North American viewers, who want to laugh when they see or hear an advertisement. 

“Funny ads are more memorable” is a fairly ethnocentric statement.

That impact, however, almost disappears in other geographies. That’s why “funny ads are more memorable” is a fairly ethnocentric statement. Humour does not make an ad universally more memorable.

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 9.30.48 AM.png

Does humour persuade?

Humorous ads might be most likely to be remembered in the Western world. But are they more persuasive? 

If your objective is to entertain the viewer, getting them involved and engaged with the brand, then the use of humour is an effective tactic. However, if you need to persuade your audience, then you must know this: Humour does not boost persuasion, for humorous ads are seen as less credible and relevant. 

Humour does not boost persuasion, for humorous ads are seen as less credible and relevant.

Also, humour impedes the transfer of new information. If you need to educate the viewer about something new (new ingredient, a new formula, etc.), you are better off staying away from humour.

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 9.39.52 AM.png

 

To whom does the humour serve?

As the famous saying goes, “Half the money you spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is you don’t know which half.” We might, actually, have a clue. 

Humour works best when it is related to the product. Where branding is weak the ad entertains the viewer. But it neither advances the brand’s message nor adds to its equity. In such cases, humour becomes a self-serving concept. So, while humour matters, what matters, even more, is the brand-centric delivery of it.

“Half the money you spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is you don’t know which half.” We might, actually, have a clue.

Laughing is universal. What makes us laugh isn’t.

Anyone who has ever interacted with a foreigner would know that jokes are culture-specific, for humour is embedded in language and culture. In the absence of shared knowledge, humour does not function. 

For instance, BBC Culture asked movie critiques around the world to rank their favourite comedies of all time. The votes varied drastically from country to country and from region to region. The study states that “silent cinema is particularly popular with Asians. The French are really into Jerry Lewis and Woody Allen; Brits love to keep their quips dry; Australians like to dive headlong into the bawdy, and Indians prefer keeping their jokes jolly.”

Humour is also gender-specific. Men and women perceive humour differently. There is quite a bit of difference in response to humour between men and women. In general, while men hold fun in high regard, women tend to notice the dark side of jokes.

In general, while men hold fun in high regard, women tend to notice the dark side of jokes.

That, however, doesn’t mean that women think humour matters less. On the contrary, research shows that globally, women find humour just as important as men (49 percent vs 46 percent.) That said, the same study tells us that far fewer ads featuring women try to be funny. While 51 percent of global ads featuring men use humour, this is true of just 22 percent of ads featuring women, which might have something to do with the fact that advertising is still a boys’ club.

Humour style depends on the personality of the viewer

We said humour is culture and gender-specific. But above it all, humour is highly subjective. What is funny to you might not be funny to your cousin. And that’s where psychometrics come into play.

What is funny to you might not be funny to your cousin. And that’s where psychometrics come into play.

At the heart of advertising lies demographics. “Our target audience is a Caucasian male, between the ages of 25-45, living in West Coast,” says one ad brief. Based on your income, race, and age- you and -let’s say- your cousin might have an identical profile. The problem is, while you are similar on the surface, deep down, your personality and that of your cousin’s might be galaxies apart. 

For instance, you might like upbeat music, he eclectic, sophisticated jazz. You might prefer going on shopping trips, he sailing. You might be influenced by family when making product purchases, he not so much. 

All those things are actually predictable thanks to the Big Five (OCEAN) personality traits, which can reveal a lot of information about one’s lifestyle and behaviours. Your personality could forecast the success of your marriage, your academic performance, your achievements at work, or your political tendencies, with surprisingly high accuracy.

Image result for "big five personality"  

Personality traits could also predict what kind of communication might appeal to you. For instance, extraverts have a favourable attitude toward transformational ads. They also love going to the movie theatre, while not liking as much watching TV. Highly conscientious people, on the other hand, are sensitive to brands that boost their prestige and self-confidence. Furthermore, they are more likely to be persuaded by a comparative ad. 

Personality traits could also predict what kind of communication might appeal to you.

Scientific literature shows that there is a relationship between humour and personality. To put it succinctly, the personality of your target audience determines how you should use humour. Let’s dig a bit deeper.

Four kinds of humour

To categorize the types of humour, we can imagine a 2×2 matrix. The horizontal axis is about the focus of the humour. Interpersonal humour serves to enhance one’s relations with others. Intrapersonal humour, on the other hand, focuses on the self and acts as a form of mental protection. 

The vertical axis is about the content of the humour. Benign one is constructive, whereas malign one is destructive.

By using these two criteria, we can identify four distinct categories. Affiliative humour (interpersonal/benign) is about telling jokes and stories, to relate to others and improve relationships.  

Self-enhancing humour (intrapersonal/benign) is about laughing at life’s idiosyncrasies. That allows us to distance ourselves from stressful problems. 

Aggressive humour (interpersonal/malign) is about sarcasm, ridicule, irony, for it helps one to manipulate, threaten, and possibly control others. 

Finally, there is self-defeating humour (intrapersonal/malign), which is allowing oneself to be the “butt of the joke,” to get attention from others. It is a type of defensive denial whereby people hide their negative feelings and avoid facing up rejected aspects of their personality.

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 10.06.35 AM.png

The question is -if your brand is going to have a funny tone of voice- which type of humour should you choose? Usually, that decision is made in a rather intuitive way. However,  it doesn’t have to be that way. 

Personality meets humour

We know that enthusiastic and assertive people prefer benign humour. Also, intellectual and open-minded people prefer self-enhancing humour. People that possess volatile and withdrawal personality traits, however, are primed for self-defeating humour. The absence of those traits, on the other hand, makes self-enhancing humour more desirable. Likewise, compassion and politeness are indicators of whether one would prefer affiliative or aggressive humour. 

With those insights at our disposal, let’s revisit you and your imaginary cousin. 

Based on his profile, your cousin might prefer self-defeating humour. (high on openness to experience and extraversion, and medium on neuroticism.)

You, in contrast, might respond more positively to affiliate humour.  (high on agreeableness and extraversion, and medium on openness to experience.) 

To reiterate, humour is both gender and culture-specific. As per gender differences, around the world, women tend to be somewhat higher than men in neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. So, right of the bat, that eliminates the use of self-enhancing humour when communicating to women -unless you know that your target audience is asking for it. Affiliative humour might be a better fit.

Women are categorically less open to self-enhancing humour, whereas they are more open to affiliative humour.

On the cultural side, let us pick two countries that are thousands of miles apart: Brazil and Turkey. Data shows that Brazilians are lower in extraversion, open to experience, and agreeableness than Turks. They also score higher in neuroticism. That tells us that -culturally- Brazilians might be more open to malign humour than Turks, who are more likely to be offended by it. 

Actionable insights 

Even if you have access to comprehensive data -which nobody does- you can not predict human behaviour with 100% accuracy. 

That said, by combining advertising research and psychometric knowledge, creatives and strategists could make more educated guesses about the degree and how they should use of humour.

So, before we sum it up, let’s go over a five rule of thumbs.

1. Use humour if your target audience likes you

As mentioned above, humour diminishes persuasiveness, especially when you need to say something new. Moreover, if your target audience has a non-favourable attitude towards your brand, then the use of humour becomes riskier. 

So, as a rule of thumb, if (a) your target audience favours your brand, (b) you are not communicating new information, then (c) you don’t need to convince them to buy your product, then you can feel more comfortable using humour. 

2. Use humour if you want to gain attention, not comprehension.

We live in the -what’s called- Attention Economy. Communication specialists state that people’s attention is a scarce resource. That’s why, according to the traditional model called AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action,) the primary communication task of a brand should be to grab people’s attention. That’s where jokes and wit come into play.  

Humour, indeed, enhances attention. In a sea of sameness, it helps your message to stand up. That gain in attention, however, comes at a cost. Funny ads distract viewers, suppressing their cognition -especially the critical type. When that happens, people face difficulty processing the central benefit of the brand. As a result, people remember the joke yet forgot the product.

As a rule of thumb, try to remove the product from the ad. If the ad is not funny anymore, then it means that humour positively affects the cognition of the viewer. If the ad is still funny, then you are trading attention for comprehension.

3. Use humour if you advertise a low-involvement product

In line with the previous point, high-involvement products require higher cognitive effort. According to Adam Alter, a psychologist and professor at New York’s Stern School of Business, ‘people associate more complexity with luxury products and so disfluency, or cognitive difficulty, makes luxury products more appealing.’

That’s why humour works more effectively for low-involvement products, especially if it is a hedonic product. According to a study that took place in the UK and the US, humour was used nearly half the time for low-involvement hedonic products, but in only one in seven instances for high-involvement hedonic products. And when humour was used in high-involvement products, it was more effective when it was relevant to a simple argument.

4. Use humour when your message is viewed in public

We can imagine humour as a kind of social lubricant. Some even claim that there is a biological reason for humour. For that reason, humour is more effective when viewed in the presence of others – such as when we are a movie theatre or watching the Super Bowl.

That makes sense. According to the Big Five personality model, people who score high in extraversion tend to be more merry, cheerful, happy. Moreover, as we discussed above, they are more likely to prefer a social experience such as watching a movie at the theatre to watching TV alone. 

So, if your audience is more likely to see your message in the presence of others, then you can feel more comfortable using humour. If, on the other hand, they will see it alone -and cannot immediately share it with others, then a more severe approach might be more appropriate.

5. Use humour if you are facing a behavioural barrier

Some communication challenges are hard to overcome. For instance, how do you convince people to stop smoking, use less energy, or exercise more often? For each one of those tasks, there is a behavioural barrier, which makes people more resistant to your message.

In such cases, humour might be a useful tactic. Remember, humour distracts people and suppresses their negative cognition. In times like that, people find it more difficult to counter-argue. You can use that as a door opener to start a conversation.

That’s why if you are trying to persuade people to do something that they are resistant to, you can use humour as a foot-in-the-door technique. It won’t help you convince them. But it will help your message to gain attention and be not rejected.

7 Comments

  1. Article was so long, it needed homour to make me want to read it. 😂😂😂😂😂 Now that I laughed, on the serious, for humour to be vital, it must be strategic. Am still an advocate of the ad creator being the consumer. From consulting them, one will know where humor will be successful.

    1. “For humour to be vital, it must be strategic.”
      Exactly! That sums the main idea of the article beautifully. Humour for the sake of humour -at best- could increase the awareness of the brand. It can’t change perceptions.

  2. I remember trying when I wanted to do so shoe designs etc for Nike. Speaking to the PR was the way to go. She was on social media, fb included, so I went over to her profile to see if I could learn which way to approach her. Her profile made me think honour approach. When I used it, it did not work. She just looked at the message and IGNORED it (but to be fair, she answered my twitter request for some unfor one Lebrons sneaks). If there is an image upload section here, will post her profile, when screen shoot it. I guess between the time she posted that her profile details and when I send her a message, she had become more matured and used fb less. She needed to change her profile infor. Lesson: no matter how funny a a STRANGER is on their profiles, never use honour to engage them at the entry stage unless they are the ones trying to engage you (of course, I learnt that can be a strategy to lower the strangers cognition and know who really this person is).

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.