Doğuş Group: setting a corporate vision while the portfolio was being sold
Doğuş Group, then among the largest private conglomerates in Turkey, with interests spanning media, marinas, automotive and hospitality, needed to make sense of a portfolio that confused the market. Working as part of I Mean It’s team in Istanbul in 2014, I built the brand architecture as part of a corporate restructuring vision — at a point when the group was selling major assets rather than acquiring them.
Client: Doğuş Group · Sector: Multi-brand group — media, marinas, automotive, hospitality · Market: Turkey, with international operations · Year: 2014 · Agency partner: I Mean It, Istanbul · My role: Brand strategy · Services: Brand architecture
The problem
The portfolio had grown faster than the story that held it together. Messaging differed across products and subsidiaries, newly acquired brands sat awkwardly beside long-standing ones, and international expansion raised questions about how much each market should adapt. The result was a group whose parts were individually clear and collectively confusing.
The timing made it harder. This was a period of significant financial restructuring and heavy asset sell-offs against a broader debt crisis, with divisional performance uneven. Architecture work is difficult enough when a group is deciding what to add; it is considerably harder when the group is deciding what to let go.
What I found
The group had been trying to answer a question that had no answer: whether it was a branded house or a house of brands. It was neither, and almost no conglomerate of that size ever is. Forcing every subsidiary into one structure was producing the friction, not resolving it.
The useful move was to stop organising by legal entity and start organising by tier. Capital-intensive, trust-based businesses — construction, automotive, real estate — benefit from carrying the group name, because institutional credibility is exactly what the parent supplies. Joint ventures need co-branding that respects both partners’ equity. Consumer and lifestyle brands need the parent kept out of sight altogether: a diner at a luxury steakhouse does not want to feel they are eating at a holding company’s venue.
What I did
I organised the portfolio into architectural tiers, each with its own naming and endorsement rules, and set out how new acquisitions or partnerships should be placed within them. The structure was built to be used by customers navigating categories rather than by executives reading an organisation chart, and it formed part of the corporate restructuring vision rather than sitting alongside it.
Why it mattered
Everyone in the room had the same financial facts and drew different conclusions from them, which is what makes restructuring a brand problem as much as a balance-sheet one. A portfolio structure is also a decision-making tool: it tells a group what it is, which is the first step towards deciding what it should keep.
Multi-brand groups are one of three sectors agencies most often bring me into. See how the partnership works.